Merry Christmas!

Impeaching the President

Political Suicide by Impeachment

Democrats are VERY foolish demanding impeachment based on hating and wanting to get rid of Trump because Pres. Trump and the rigid GOP establishment will NEVER forget what the Dems are doing and why they are doing this.

So, this impertinent and bizarre impeachment charade will come back to bite the Democrats sometime down the political road. Also, the precedent will have been set for Republicans to do this with the next Democrat who becomes President and then each side may opt to do it again and again UNLESS....

Congress comes together in its own best interest to pass a law or laws to prevent such politically-bent maneuverings from ever happening again. Only then will the impeachment procedure remain as our forefathers wanted it to be....in the event impeachment of a President is actually required based on reliable and actual evidence of abuse.

Democrats are Unhinged

Democrats are unhinged. They mostly are nasty individuals and as a group even worse. They have done NOTHING for American Citizens and they have wasted millions in tax dollars trying to win the 2020 Election the only way they think they can....by removing Pres. Trump from office.

IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN!!! and the Dems as a Party have lost all credibility. It's a shame what they have done to our nation and it will follow them for many years to come.

Killing of Top ISIS Leader

Trump and Military Personnel Deserve Kudos, not finger-pointing

In response to the articles and comments re: Democrat disapproval of Russia being informed over leftist Congress members, specifically Nancy Pelosi….

Amazing that Democrats don't give Pres. Trump credit for getting rid of one of the biggest dirt-bags in the World today. They rather focus on their "hurt feelings" which has become the "lay of the land" for the extreme left. Pres. Trump and our military men and women in this maneuver should be congratulated, not verbally attacked.

Russia was notified to prevent any action by that nation against our forces because the operation required flying over dangerous air space and could have been seen as an aggressive overt operation rather than the actual covert intent to eliminate one of the most dangerous (ISIS) leaders on the planet. Russia does not like ISIS.  The US notified Russia and that nation agreed to hold fire because the mission was of mutual benefit.  Democrats need to get past their “hurt feelings” and see the reality of the situation.

looking back briefly on Obama...

Obama was a con-man who made all sorts of promises to the American Middle Class, but followed through on none. He also put Islam first and bowed to Islamic leaders.

Obama also, along with his buddy Holder, hammered a wedge between Blacks and Whites throughout our nation and both men were anti-law enforcement to such an extent that they permitted violent racist crimes in our streets, e.g., St. Louis, Baltimore, Detroit, etc., etc.

He pushed through Obama care and demanded the health care program to be rammed through Congress, many lawmakers did not even read the document, to which Pelosi once or twice stated, "You have to pass it to see how it all works."

Again, Obama actually was one of the worst President's we have ever had. He allowed ISIS to flourish and he stated that the way to cure the ISIS problem was to give them jobs!

Simply stated, Obama was a con-man who did little for the majority of Americans. I recall Obama once getting down from his plane and saluting a Marine guard with his left hand while holding a cup of coffee in his right.

OBAMA WAS A MISERABLE AND UNINFORMED PRESIDENT!

Something is rotten in Washington DC

 Ok here goes a little information.

Hillary Clinton bought the DNCs debt in 2016 to the tune of 12 million. This means Hillary Clinton owns the DNC. It is no longer a government entity it was privatized.

That's why Bernie was ousted during the 2016 campaign.

Tim Kaine was the head honcho of the DNC at the time. Hillary promised him the Vice presidency when she won...which she didn't. Tim Kaine steps down as the head of the DNC and recommends Debbie Wasserman Schultz. D W Schultz ran the voter fraud for Hillary along with the Awon ?? spelling?? brothers...remember them?

Why didn't Hillary offer the VP position to Bernie? Because she had to have Tim Kaine...an unknown at the time...because he was the head of the DNC and she had to take over the DNC and privatize it.

Seth Rich had the goods on Hillary and sent the information to Julian Assange.... Wikileaks. Seth was upset because he was a Bernie supporter.

After Seth's murder Obama paid his half of the DNC. Obama then hires Crowdstrike to hack everything and everyone. Crowdstrike's founder is a Russian/ Ukrainian... here we have that infamous country Ukraine again. This Crowdstrike founder Russian/Ukrainian worked for the Ukrainian intelligence agency. Is it getting any clearer now?

The Bidens business in Ukraine is the tip of the iceberg.

Hillary is going to slide in the race watch and see.

She owns the DNC and did in 2016 that's why she was on the ticket and why she will be the nominee come 2020.

Forget all these clowns out there campaigning Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee because she owns the DNC.

She and Tulsi Gabbard have been slinging words back and forth today....not sure I trust Tulsi however if she's on the up and up she can bury Hillary because she like Seth Rich has all the dirt on her.

Anti-Trumpeters March on and on....

Inside the media’s relentless crusade to destroy President Trump

(lengthy, but worth the read....)

Since Donald Trump’s election in 2016, the mainstream media has shed its once-noble mission — the pursuit of the truth — and instead adopted a new purpose: to take down the president. In an excerpt from her new book, “Resistance at All Costs: How Trump Haters are Breaking America,” out Tuesday, KIMBERLEY STRASSEL examines how far the press will go in its relentless crusade . . .

Last week The Washington Post revealed the alarming news that House Democrats were considering having their anonymous “whistleblower” testify from a remote location, and in disguise. Just as shocking as the details of this plan was the justification the Post ladled on this Democratic effort to hide impeachment information from the public.

It explained, high up in the story, that the cloak-and-dagger approach was merely Democrats expressing “distrust of their GOP colleagues, whom they see as fully invested in defending a president who has attacked the whistleblower’s credibility and demanded absolute loyalty from Republicans.”

This, from a newspaper with a tagline of “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”

Maybe the better journalistic epitaph is: Democracy dies in bias. How did journalism get here?

I’ve never engaged much in media criticism, because it’s almost too obvious. Yes, the mainstream media is liberal and biased. But at least in the past, that bias was largely a function of insularity. Most reporters weren’t even fully aware they were prejudiced politically; everyone they worked and socialized with held the same left-of-center views.

That’s changed in the age of Trump. The press has embraced its bias, joined the Resistance and declared its allegiance to one side of a partisan war. It now openly declares those who offer any fair defense of this administration as Trump “enablers.” It writes off those who question the FBI or Department of Justice actions in 2016 as “conspiracy” theorists. It acts as willing scribes for Democrats and former Obama officials; peddles evidence-free accusations; sources stories from people with clear political axes to grind; and closes its eyes to clear evidence of government abuse.

This media war is extraordinary, overt and increasingly damaging to the country..

The latest installment of this Democratic-media tie-up is the Ukraine story. Just a few weeks ago, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff explained that the intelligence community inspector general wanted to transmit an anonymous “whistleblower” complaint to him but had been stopped by the Trump administration. Schiff has for 10 months been obsessing over how to impeach Trump, so his claim merited great skepticism.

Instead, the media ran with it. Even as it acknowledged that it did not know the subject of the complaint, or the background of the accuser, it began running stories postulating that the Trump administration had engaged in a cover-up. It later accepted whole-cloth the whistleblower’s hearsay accusation that Trump had demanded a Ukrainian investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden as a condition of military aid — before even seeing a transcript of the Trump call. The New York Times was so eager to push the impeachment narrative forward (and give it credibility) that it divulged the sensitive detail that the whistleblower was a CIA officer detailed to the White House.

Sadly, the press behavior of the past few weeks is nothing new. The election of Donald Trump has led to the greatest disintegration of press standards in modern history. For those wondering if they are getting the “real story” in the Ukraine impeachment drama, it’s worth taking a walk back through the past few years of what we now know was the Russia-collusion hoax.

One particularly bad decision helped drive all the rest of that false narrative: The press became willing advocates for government actors (at least the ones they liked). This is the reverse of the role the press is supposed to play. The media exists to be a government watchdog.

Sure, when it comes to the Trump administration, the press rides herd on every issue. But when it has come to former Obama officials (Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan), the media has swallowed everything it is told. It’s hard to explain just how big a dereliction of duty this is. The FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation fell clearly into a government-abuse-of-power story, of the kind the press exists to expose. It came laden with red flags — opposition research from the rival campaign, backdoor channels to the IRS, surveillance of American citizens. And yet anything the former people of power told the press to write, the press wrote.

Willingness to cast aside facts in favor of theory is what has fed years of hysterical collusion conspiracy theories.

The best example is that infamous New York Times story about the “origin” of the FBI probe. In late 2017, when former House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes finally came close to winning his battle with the DOJ to see documents about the infamous Steele dossier, FBI protectors panicked. They knew how terrible it would look that they had used opposition research from a rival campaign to get surveillance warrants on at least one Trump campaign official. So someone called The New York Times for help in getting ahead of the story. On Dec. 30, 2017, it published: “How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt.”

The story was, of course, all about how George Papadopoulos had inspired the FBI’s probe, and it flat-out narrated what would become the FBI line about its origins. It also flatly dismissed the dossier. The Papadopoulos take “answers one of the lingering mysteries of the past year: What so alarmed American officials to provoke the FBI to open a counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign months before the presidential election? It was not, as Trump and other politicians have alleged, a dossier compiled by a former British spy hired by a rival campaign,” opined the Times. The story cited nobody in its story other than anonymous “American and foreign officials.”

Read also:

Biden calls for Trump's impeachment, president quickly tweets response

In May 2018, the paper ran another “blockbuster” story about the FBI’s Trump investigation, which was code-named Crossfire Hurricane. The Times reported that “Only in mid-September, congressional investigators say, did [the dossier] reach the Crossfire Hurricane team.” This is false. Justice Department official Bruce Ohr has testified under oath that he briefed a lot of people about the dossier — and its political provenance — not long after it was handed to him in late July. As of the writing of this book, the Times has never updated or corrected that piece.

The willingness to be spoon-fed is what drove so many big press bloopers. Were there a Collusion Press-Error Hall of Fame, CNN would be the first inductee. There was CNN’s decision in 2017 to run a story, based on one unnamed source, claiming a presidential adviser, Anthony Scaramucci, was under investigation for his ties to a Russian investment fund. CNN had to retract the story, and three of its journalists resigned.

In December 2017, CNN announced a scoop for the ages. It claimed it had evidence that Donald Trump Jr. had been offered by advance access to hacked Democratic emails. MSNBC and CBS also claimed to have “confirmed” this evidence that the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks had been colluding. It later came out that the outlets had gotten the date on their evidence wrong. Donald Trump Jr. had been sent an email directing him to look at the WikiLeaks dump — after WikiLeaks had made it public.

President Trump speaks to reporters and members of the media as he walks to board Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House.

Also don’t forget BuzzFeed’s epic “news” in January 2019 that President Trump personally directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the Trump Tower project in Moscow. Politicians seized on the news, and Schiff promised to do what was “necessary” to find out if the president had committed “perjury.” Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro said that if the allegations were true, Trump “must resign.” The problem? They weren’t. This one was such an invention that special counsel Bob Mueller’s team made a rare statement, denying the BuzzFeed report.

There are plenty more. The Washington Post claimed Russians had accessed the US electrical grid through a Vermont utility. Not true. Slate claimed a Trump server had been communicating with Russia. Not true. The Guardian claimed that Paul Manafort had visited Julian Assange in his hideout at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London — three times. If so, Mueller missed it. The press gets furious when Trump talks about “fake news.” But what else would you call this?

Another low of the past few years — which we are seeing again now — has been the media’s willingness to run fact-free accusations. Case in point: claims from the Steele dossier. The specific charges in that document have never been proven.

Opposition-research firm Fusion GPS was incredibly clever in its decision to feed that document to the FBI to give it more credibility. But the fact that the FBI had it or, that Schiff was irresponsible to quote from it during a hearing, didn’t release the press from a basic obligation: to either verify the truth or treat the document for what it was — slander. Instead, the media repeated the dossier’s claims ad nauseum, rarely bothering to note the partisan motivations behind its creation.

This willingness to cast aside facts in favor of theory is what has fed years of hysterical collusion conspiracy theories. By embracing hypothetics (rather than tracking down facts), the press indulged in endless “connect the dots” exercises.

In April 2018, two reporters from McClatchy cited “sources” who said, “Mueller has evidence [Michael] Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of the dossier.” The story claimed Cohen had secretly snuck into the Czech Republic, through Germany, presumably for a clandestine meeting with Kremlin officials. It again quoted only “sources familiar with the matter.” Yet Cohen had vehemently insisted that he’d never been there. And the Mueller report would later flatly say he had not. McClatchy, as of the writing of this book, still hasn’t retracted the story. Why? It claims that what it was reporting was that Mueller had “received evidence,” and it noted that Mueller never said he didn’t receive evidence. See?

Liberal opinion writers were even worse. One of the standout headlines from 2018 came from Jonathan Chait, writing in New York Magazine. It read: “Prump-Tutin: Will Trump Be Meeting with His Counterpart — Or His Handler?” Chait asked: “What if Trump has been a Russian asset from 1987?” Then followed thousands of words that purported to tie together Trump, obscure Russians, Stormy Daniels, Assange and so much more. The story, suffice it to say, did not age well.

All reporters sometimes bend a rule, or go out on a limb or get something wrong. But the important thing is that they usually do this in aid of getting truth to the public. What has defined the media breakdown that started in 2016 was the press’ abandonment of standards in aid of peddling a narrative — rather than reality. This abandonment has had terrible consequences for the industry and for the country. A Monmouth University poll in early 2018 found that a whopping 77 percent of Americans believe traditional TV and newspaper outlets report “fake news.” And 42 percent of respondents said they believed outlets did this specifically to promote a political agenda. These kinds of numbers are alarming for civil society. The more Americans are turned off from traditional news, the more they turn to dubious sources and read and listen only to things with which they agree. For those worried about our increasingly polarized society, the media is feeding that divide.

Excerpted from “Resistance at All Costs: How Trump Haters Are Breaking America” by Kimberley Strassel, Copyright © 2019. Available from Twelve, an imprint of Hachette Book Group, Inc.

in response to the endless push to impeach Pres. Trump

Right, let's all keep focus on the impeachment "movement" while our nation is attacked from within by socialist and terrorist agendas, the middle class sees no relief from the democrat side, nothing is being done re: immigration reform and illegals, growing homeless and street populations, ever-increasing Cost of Living Increases that jump way ahead of our income capabilities, inflation, and medical expenses that have surpassed our monthly mortgages and growth every year no matter how much insurance coverage we purchase....a.k.a., OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES!!!

Let's not give our attention to resolving these issues....let's just let Democrats control our lives and direction.

Truth is the 2-Party System has failed American Citizens and is ruining our American Lives! Americans need to demand that lawmakers FINALLY WORK TOGETHER to fix what is broken. Get rid of all these bums in Washington who get paid much better than we do, who don't have to worry about medical coverage or retirement packages and who refuse to work in our best interests!  We need term limits!  We need grounded people who actually work for us!  Keep government out of our lives!

Political Contamination: "What We Know Versus What We Suspect, Part III"

What We Know Versus What We Suspect, Part III

May 15, 2019 | Posted by Stu Cvrk, Retired Naval Officer, Constitutional Conservative

Over the past several years, a LOT has leaked into the public domain about political corruption, criminal conspiracies, pay-for-play, and other crimes among the US political class. We know what we know and can only speculate about that which we don’t know – and which may be purposely hidden from us by the Deep State and the legacy media. The purpose of this series is to examine what is already in the public domain on several scandals/crimes and then make some informed guesses as to what ELSE is hiding underneath.

Part I we discussed the shenanigans and cover-ups surrounding the House IT server scandal and FISA abuse during the Obama regime.

Part II covered Hillary Clinton’s classified information mishandling crimes and the illegal unmasking of American citizens by the Obama regime while highlighting the corrupt Obama DoJ/FBI FISA abuse.

However, there is another very important component of the FISA abuse that warrants some sunlight, and that is the Obama regime’s decision to share US citizens’ information with foreign intelligence agencies! The purpose of that information-sharing was to facilitate the collection of potentially politically-damning information on Trump associates (and very likely those of other Republican candidates during the primaries as a hedge) by those same foreign agencies. This would enable those “cooperating countries” to ingratiate themselves with the new “Hillary Clinton presidency” by having helped her into the Oval Office. Perhaps this explains a tiny bit why the European political elite are such bitterly vocal anti-Trumpers these days? Here is how it happened:

A secret memo granted broad rights to the FBI to share information gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act with foreign officials. Two-way exchange of information with foreign officials could allow the politicized targeting of Americans, since foreign nations aren’t obligated to uphold the U.S. Constitution. The efforts by the Justice Department to gather information on Trump aides repeatedly involved figures associated with foreign agencies. Foreign allies strongly opposed President Donald Trump declassifying information illuminating the investigation into Russian collusion. Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor, told TheDCNF “this language is very concerning.”

“There is ever-mounting evidence that our ‘allies’ in the ‘Five-Eyes’ world were part of the conspiracy to destroy President Trump,” she said, referring to the intelligence alliance between the U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.K.

One common theme emerges in the techniques that Obama-era DOJ officials used to gather information on Trump associates during the 2016 election: Operatives were seemingly repeatedly lured to foreign locations.

Let’s connect the dots. The Obama regime authorized the disclosure of American citizens’ information to “foreign intel agencies” in exchange for any collected intel that could be used POLITICALLY, not necessarily for criminal investigations! The US IC/FBI/DoJ cabal orchestrated meetings between “Trump associates” (plants like Paul Manafort, Christopher Page, and George Papdopoulos) and supposed Russia-connected foreign operatives on foreign soil in order to facilitate intelligence collection by those foreign agencies in support of the “muh Russia” hoax. Those foreign countries were apparently only too happy to oblige and curry favor with the likely new president (Hillary Clinton, as per all of the 2016 polls) but were caught completely off-guard when Donald Trump beat her on 8 Aug 2016. For example, British Prime Minister Teresa May made a hasty trip to Washington, DC, right after the GCHQ director (i.e., the UK intelligence chief) resigned precipitously on 23 Jan 19. Other countries reportedly also communicated concerns to the new POTUS about potential declassification of FISA warrant applications– very likely concerned about the disclosure of their participation in the conspiracy against him.

Repeat after me: this is sedition, conspiracy, and treason committed on a massive scale over many months by a number of senior IC, FBI, and DoJ personnel, as orchestrated directly from the Obama White House.

Time for some informed speculation:

1.    As a table-setter, Sen. Rand Paul publicly fingered former CIA Director John Brennan for legitimizing the false Russian dossier. Refer to this article for more insight.

2.    In my opinion, that accusation didn’t go nearly far enough, as Brennan almost certainly was orchestrating the foreign intel agencies’ involvement in the seditious conspiracy on behalf of the Obama White House. Would Brennan’s “recruitment” of foreign intel agencies have likely been limited to just the FVEY countries? I don’t think so. We already know that the Dutch provided intel to the FBI about “Russia election hacking.” Refer to this article for more on the hacking.

3.    There is a high likelihood that other foreign intel agencies were squeezed by Brennan from 2015 onward in order to dig up dirt on the declared Republican presidential candidates and shift focus to Trump exclusively after he won the nomination. Here is a reminder of how the “Russia hoax” got going as reported by the leftwing UK newspaper The Guardian back in early 2017. Check out the list of countries that were involved!

GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added. Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as SIGINT [signals intelligence] – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said. Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.

1.    #Spygate is much greater than a US DoJ/IC/FBI seditious conspiracy and illegal surveillance operation, friends. Brennan (on behalf of the Obama White House) pressed foreign countries into service – either willingly or unwillingly (it remains to be seen which!).

Let us turn to another scandalous topic: the deliberate leaking of classified information to the legacy media and other illegal actions by the seditious conspiracy (a/k/a the cabal), including former senior Obama regime appointees and sitting US congressmen. First of all, Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA) recently stated that he is making eight new criminal referrals to the DoJ concerning misconduct during the Trump-Russia investigation.

[Nunes] is preparing to send eight criminal referrals to the Department of Justice this week concerning alleged misconduct from “Watergate wannabes” during the Trump-Russia investigation, including the leaks of “highly classified material” and conspiracies to lie to Congress and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.

“Five of them are what I would call straight up referrals — so just referrals that name someone and name the specific crimes,” Nunes told Maria Bartiromo. “Those crimes are lying to Congress, misleading Congress, leaking classified information.”'

“[T]he first conspiracy is FISA abuse and other matters. We believe there was a conspiracy to lie to the FISA court, mislead the FISA court by numerous individuals that all need to be investigated and looked at that, and we believe the [relevant] statute is the conspiracy statute. The second conspiracy [referral] is involving manipulation of intelligence that also could ensnarl many Americans. The third is what I would call a global leak referral,” Nunes said. “So there are about a dozen highly sensitive classified information leaks that were given to only a few reporters over the last two-and-a-half-plus years. We do believe that we’ve got pretty good information and a pretty good idea of who could be behind these leaks.”

Nunes specifically named a series of known “horrific” leaks, including the leak of conversations between Trump and the leaders of Australia and Mexico, and the transcripts of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s calls.

Rep. Nunes also commented that the number of people referred for prosecution could be at least two dozen! Makes me wonder who made the list. Then there’s Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and other House Democrats leaking classified information; could he and they be listed in those referrals? Here are a couple of linked articles commenting on that likelihood: Adam Schiff put classified info in press release. Schiff hits the fan.

How about former FBI Director Comey’s leaking of his own classified memos? He claims they “weren’t classified,” but FBI “work product” is considered sensitive at the very least and not to be released without legal review according to FBI guidelines. Read more on that here.

Then there’s that former Senate Select Intelligence Committee staffer James Wolfe who was indicted for leaking classified information. On whose bidding did he leak that information? The Senate Intelligence Committee is filled with #NeverTrump Republicans and Democrats who consorted with Russians. Refer to this for additional insight.

And there are a ton of journalists who were involved in publishing serial leaks from DoJ/FBI/IC personnel over the past two years:

§  Ken Dilanian (LA Times, then NBC News).

§  David Corn (Mother Jones Mag), one of the original “journalists” who got the “muh Russia” hoax going.

§  David Ignatius (Washington Post) leaked LTG Flynn’s conversations.

§  How many “journalists” breathlessly (and illegally) leaked Mueller special counsel information over the past two years? Literally dozens of them.

What does all this mean? Time for some more informed speculation.

1.    #Spygate was real; it was a criminal conspiracy involving literally dozens of senior IC/DoJ/FBI/Obama White House personnel, as well as foreign intelligence agencies and members of the legacy media. It was absolutely the most stupendous political conspiracy since the founding of the Republic, and we have only seen glimpses of the totality of the criminality! There will be many more surprises (and confirmed speculation) to come in the coming months.

2.    Nunes’s referrals to the DoJ are only the beginning, as POTUS’s exoneration by the Mueller report means that the counterattack has finally begun. More leakers will be exposed – almost certainly some of them Democrat members of Congress.

3.    For the first time in US history, we will see a former FBI director (Comey) and deputy director (McCabe) and former CIA director (Brennan) indicted. Their acolytes who moved to CNN and MSNBC are in legal jeopardy, too, for knowingly propagating seditious information (e.g., Josh Campbell and Asha Rangappa).

4.    There is an even chance that foreign governments will fall when the declassified FISA warrant application(s) are released for public review – with the May government in the UK being the first likely candidate.

5.    That a number of legacy media participants (and specific networks like CNN and MSNBC) were complicit in selling the “muh Russia” hoax means that a major and long overdue course correction of the media will be in order as the conspirators are indicted and prosecuted. Don’t forget that the list of “journalists” paid by Fusion GPS (with the money coming from the Hillary campaign via the Democrat law firm Perkins Coie) will be released at some point. Those “journalists” are in the final stages of their careers, one way or another!

6.    I am convinced that a few Democrat law firms like Perkins Coie will be swept up in the prosecutions to come, too. This is long overdue because they have been highly paid complicit cutouts for laundering money to avoid FEC-monitored campaign finance accountability for Democrats for decades!

7.    The fact that foreign countries were involved in the #Spygate conspiracy will end up in a major reset of US foreign (and trade) policy because, if there’s one thing that POTUS understands, it is how to use leverage, and he definitely has it now! This is NOT what they all bargained for!

There is still more to come in this series, folks. I’m going to pause here and present more informed speculation in Part IV and then wrap it all up with commentary on a common theme that persists throughout these scandals.  Image: AP Photo

 https://americaoutloud.com/what-we-know-versus-what-we-suspect-part-iii/

Current Political Climate...

Politics:

The more Democrats do the stupid things they are doing and verbalize them publicly, the more the majority of US Citizens see them for what they are: a lost political party that is "shooting itself in the foot" and in continuing this irrational assault will actually inspire more voters to support the President and to reelect him in 2020!